Does Blockchain Technology Have Value for Islamic Finance?

When the Dubai Islamic Economy Development Centre quietly announced a pilot project to issue sukuk—Islamic bonds—on a blockchain network, the story barely made global headlines. Yet inside the region’s financial circles, the move was seen as a potential milestone. For decades, Islamic finance has sought ways to reconcile traditional ethics with modern financial efficiency. Blockchain, a technology that promises transparency and trust without intermediaries, seemed to offer a possible bridge.

The stakes are high. Islamic finance has grown rapidly since the 1970s, expanding across Asia, the Gulf, and parts of Africa. Today it is estimated to exceed $3.1 trillion in global assets, spanning banks, investment funds, and insurance (takaful) providers. Yet despite its growth, the industry faces recurring criticisms: inconsistent regulation, limited liquidity, and uneven technological adoption. The question now is whether blockchain technology—once seen as the playground of cryptocurrency speculators—can help solve some of these structural weaknesses while staying true to Islamic principles.
Related: Should You Trust Blockchain Technology?

A Meeting Point of Faith and Technology

Islamic finance is governed by the moral framework of Shariah law, which prohibits interest (riba), excessive uncertainty (gharar), and investment in unethical sectors such as alcohol, gambling, or weapons. Transactions must be backed by tangible assets and based on fairness, risk-sharing, and transparency.

At first glance, blockchain technology appears almost tailor-made for such an environment. A blockchain is essentially a shared, immutable digital ledger that records transactions across multiple participants. Each entry, or “block,” is verified cryptographically and added to a chain that cannot be altered retroactively—creating a permanent, auditable record.

“Islamic finance thrives on the principles of trust and transparency,” says Khalid Mansoor, a fintech consultant based in Kuala Lumpur. “Blockchain can make those ideals operational. It doesn’t replace Shariah—it helps enforce it.”

By using blockchain, banks and investors could potentially ensure that every step of a transaction—asset creation, verification, profit distribution—is recorded and compliant with Shariah rules. It could, in short, hard-code morality into finance.

Smart Contracts and Digital Sukuk

The clearest applications of blockchain in Islamic finance have emerged in sukuk, the Shariah-compliant alternative to bonds. Sukuk are asset-backed instruments that give investors a share in profits rather than interest payments. Traditionally, issuing sukuk is slow, expensive, and administratively complex, involving layers of documentation and multiple intermediaries.

By tokenising sukuk—issuing them digitally on a blockchain—issuers can cut costs, accelerate settlement, and reach a global investor base. In 2022, Malaysia’s fintech regulator piloted a blockchain-based sukuk that reportedly reduced issuance time from weeks to days and cut expenses by nearly a third. Similar projects in Bahrain and the UAE have shown comparable efficiencies.

Smart contracts, another blockchain feature, add a layer of automation. These are self-executing programs that trigger when predefined conditions are met—for example, automatically distributing profits to investors or halting trades if compliance criteria fail. For Islamic funds, this could mean contracts that instantly reject investments in non-compliant sectors, enforce profit-and-loss sharing ratios, and provide instant auditing trails.

“The opportunity is to integrate Shariah compliance directly into code,” says Dr Amina Farouk, a Shariah adviser based in London. “It could reduce errors, lower costs, and make Islamic products more credible in international markets.”

A Complicated Fit

Still, enthusiasm is not universal. For one, regulatory uncertainty remains a major obstacle. Few jurisdictions have comprehensive frameworks for blockchain-based financial products, and even fewer for those claiming Shariah compliance. Central banks in the Gulf, Malaysia, and Indonesia are cautiously exploring the space, but most remain wary of potential misuse or instability.

There are also jurisprudential questions. Islamic finance relies on scholarly interpretation, and opinions differ across schools of thought. Some scholars question whether digital tokens truly represent ownership of an underlying asset, a key requirement for Shariah compliance. Others worry about blockchain’s association with cryptocurrencies, which many Islamic authorities still classify as speculative and therefore impermissible.

Then there are technical challenges. Integrating blockchain with legacy banking systems is costly and complex. Small Islamic financial institutions—particularly those in emerging markets—lack the infrastructure or technical expertise to deploy blockchain solutions effectively.

“Blockchain will not magically harmonise Islamic finance,” notes Dr Farouk. “It can make processes more transparent, but it won’t solve the deeper issues of legal interpretation and governance that still divide the sector.”

Gradual Change, Not Disruption

Despite these challenges, momentum is growing. The Central Bank of Bahrain has created a regulatory sandbox for blockchain applications, allowing firms to test digital products before full-scale launch. Saudi Arabia’s Vision 2030 strategy includes fintech innovation as a pillar of economic diversification, and Malaysia’s Securities Commission continues to back experiments in digital sukuk and crowdfunding platforms.

In the private sector, fintech start-ups are developing halal payment solutions, digital identity systems, and blockchain-based auditing tools that verify Shariah compliance in real time. Some Islamic banks are exploring blockchain not only for fundraising but also for internal processes such as contract management and customer verification (KYC).

The technology also resonates with younger investors—particularly millennials and Gen Z Muslims—who are more comfortable with digital assets and demand transparency in how their money is used. For them, blockchain offers not just innovation, but reassurance.

The value of blockchain for Islamic finance may ultimately lie not in revolution but in refinement. It offers a way to make traditional systems more efficient, auditable, and inclusive without diluting their ethical foundations.

Yet adoption will depend on collaboration—between regulators, technologists, and Shariah scholars—to build trust and consistent standards. Without that, blockchain risks becoming another well-intentioned experiment, admired in theory but unused in practice.

As Khalid Mansoor puts it: “The technology is ready. The question is whether Islamic finance is ready for the mindset change that comes with it.”

If blockchain succeeds, it could help Islamic finance finally deliver on its founding promise: a system where faith, transparency, and finance move in the same direction—not by replacing human ethics, but by reinforcing them through code.