Does Contemporary Islamic Finance Align with Islamic Principles?

Islam’s economic system is not just about avoiding sin, but about building a just civilization—a vision that goes beyond mimicking conventional finance with Islamic labels.

The question of whether contemporary Islamic finance truly aligns with Islamic principles cannot be answered with a simple “yes” or “no.” Instead, it demands a layered understanding that distinguishes formal compliance (the letter of Shari‘ah) from substantive alignment (the spirit and higher objectives—maqasid—of Islamic economics).

Contemporary Islamic finance is built on the same ethical and legal foundations that have guided Islamic economic thought for many centuries. While its core structures aim to uphold principles such as avoiding riba, minimizing uncertainty, and promoting fairness, real‑world practices sometimes fall short of these ideals. Many modern financial products succeed in form but raise questions about whether they fully embody the spirit of risk‑sharing and social justice central to Islamic teachings. As a result, contemporary Islamic finance can be seen as a sincere but still evolving effort to align modern financial systems with enduring Islamic principles.

Related:  The Convergence Dividend: Why Islamic Finance, Halal Food, and Social Finance Must Align

Alignment with Foundational Islamic Principles

The Islamic economic system, as articulated in the Qur’an and Sunnah and elaborated by classical scholars like Ibn Khaldun and al-Ghazali, rests on six key pillars:

-Tawhid (Allah as ultimate authority)

-Comprehensiveness of Islam (religion governs all spheres of life)

-Trusteeship (khilafah) of humans over resources

-Productive use of Earth’s bounty within ethical limits

-Accountability in the Hereafter for economic conduct

-Rejection of wealth-based social hierarchy

Contemporary Islamic finance explicitly seeks to honor these by:

-Prohibiting riba (interest), gharar (excessive uncertainty), and maysir (gambling)

-Avoiding investment in haram industries (alcohol, pork, etc.)

-Emphasizing asset-backing and real economic activity

-Requiring oversight by Shari‘ah Supervisory Boards

From this perspective, the industry is legally valid and represents a conscious effort to avoid clear violations of Shari‘ah, as affirmed by scholars and Islamic financial institutions.

Persistent Tensions and Critiques

However, as highlighted in multiple fatwas and scholarly critiques (including from figures like Mufti Taqi Usmani), serious questions remain about economic substance vs. legal form:

Overuse of Murabahah and Tawarruq

-While Islam prioritizes risk-sharing models (e.g., Mudarabah, Musharakah), over 70% of Islamic finance relies on debt-like structures (Murabahah, Tawarruq).

-Tawarruq—especially “organized” Tawarruq—is viewed by bodies like the OIC Fiqh Academy as a hiyal (legal stratagem) that mimics interest-based loans, undermining the spirit of justice and equity.

Guaranteed Capital in Investment Funds

-As noted in the Islamweb fatwa (237232), guaranteeing capital in a Mudarabah contract is impermissible, even if profit is variable. Yet many “Islamic” funds offer capital protection.

-This contradicts the principle of shared risk—central to Islamic economics—and effectively replicates fixed-return instruments.

Benchmarking to Conventional Interest Rates

-Islamic products often use LIBOR/SOFR as pricing benchmarks.

-While scholars argue this is a neutral “market reference,” it ties Islamic finance to the Riba-based system, contradicting the goal of an independent ethical financial ecosystem.

Fragmentation and Lack of Unified Standards

-Without a global regulatory or ethical standard (e.g., full adoption of AAOIFI guidelines), practices vary widely—raising doubts about consistency in Shari‘ah compliance.

The Scholarly Middle Ground

There is broad agreement among mainstream scholars:

-Dealing with vetted Islamic institutions is halal and preferable to conventional banking.

-The current system is transitional, shaped by real-world constraints (global financial integration, regulatory frameworks, customer expectations).

-The goal remains the “ideal” Islamic economy: one based on equity, social justice, asset-backed production, and moral responsibility—not merely interest-avoidance.

Suggested Way Forward

To move from formal compliance to substantive alignment, the following steps need be examined:

1. Promote Genuine Risk-Sharing Models

Incentivize Mudarabah and Musharakah through regulatory support, tax benefits, and public awareness.

Develop robust frameworks for SME and project financing based on partnership—not debt.

2. Phase Out Controversial Instruments

Gradually reduce reliance on Tawarruq and synthetic Murabahah structures that serve as Riba surrogates.

Adopt OIC Fiqh Academy guidelines that restrict “organized Tawarruq.”

3. Establish Islamic Benchmarks

Create Shari‘ah-compliant interbank rates (e.g., based on expected profit rates or asset yields) to decouple from LIBOR/SOFR.

4. Strengthen Shari‘ah Governance

Ensure Shari‘ah boards are independent, qualified, and empowered—not merely symbolic.

Mandate transparency: disclose structures, risk allocation, and compliance rationale to customers.

5. Focus on Maqasid al-Shari‘ah

Evaluate financial products not just by contract validity, but by their impact on wealth distribution, poverty reduction, and social welfare—core objectives of Islamic economics.

6. Educate the Public

Muslims must understand that avoiding Riba is necessary but not sufficient. True Islamic finance demands ethical vigilance, not just fatwa certificates.

Conclusion

Contemporary Islamic finance partially aligns with Islamic principles: it succeeds in avoiding explicit prohibitions (like Riba) and provides a halal alternative in a Riba-dominated world—but it often falls short of embodying the spirit of justice, equity, and shared responsibility central to Islam’s economic vision.

For now, using reputable Islamic institutions is permissible and advisable for the average Muslim seeking to fulfill religious obligations. But the Ummah—scholars, policymakers, institutions, and individuals—must collectively strive to build a financial system that is not only Shari‘ah-compliant in form, but Islamically transformative in substance.